[6stringmerc]

If used in a legally binding setting to does your firm accept liability for erroneous output resulting in litigation proceedings or financial loss? Serious question because I’m a human working in a similar niche.

If not, how do you phrase that in your ToS and what is your Errors and Omissions policy language like?

[philipisik]

We don't know the use case and content... We're providing the tools to build the editor-AI-UX, which you can then connect to the LLM of your choice.

In our AI extensions, we provide callbacks like onSuccess that you can hook into, to send analytics events and track the AI's responses.

[andrewingram]

I don't work for Tiptap, but I'm curious as to what your expectations are here.

They're providing tools for integrating Tiptap with AI, including ones for reviewing suggested changes that come from LLMs. I don't really see something that Tiptap should be accepting liability for. As the developer working with Tiptap, I'd argue it's your responsibility to make sure (a) the prompts are giving generally good and useful output, and (b) that you incorporate any necessary UI to put a human in the loop of accepting the AI output. On the latter point, their AI Changes extension is one such example, but there are any number of ways of achieving this.