|
|
|
|
|
by lukan
374 days ago
|
|
On the other hand, I remember lots of stupid beginners questions I had, when learning to programm. My peers did not know them either and I had to wait sometimes days for the opportunity to ask someone advanced who knew. Blocking my progress. (Asking online was a possibility, but instead of helpful answers, insults for being newb was the standard response) With a LLM I would have had a likely correct answer immediately. And yes, yes what if it is wrong? Well, I was also taught plenty of wrong stuff from human teachers as well. I learned to think for myself. I doubt anyone decently smart who now grews up with those tools, think they are flawless. In the end, you are responsible for the product. If it works, if it passes the tests, you succeeded. That did not change. |
|
Assuming you're literate, there's no age or skill level at which it's necessary to get stuck churning on beginner-level questions. The option to RTFM is always available, right from the start.
To this day, readiness to RTFM (along with RTDS: read the damn source) is the biggest factor I can identify in the technical competency of my peers.