|
|
|
|
|
|
by mrweasel
382 days ago
|
|
|
> I'm not sure what your problem with that UI is tbh? It's not a particularly efficient way to interact with the LLMs. Despite how people hate AI being integrated into everything, I do think that's the only way it can be done effectively. My take is that the AI/LLM isn't the product, it's just a feature of a product. Like when there's "AI" in the camera apps on your phone, or some sort of machine learning in medical imaging. To get the full benefit it needs to be a technology built into your product, not a product in it self. The voice to text, text to voice is a good example. Voice to text is a feature of a transcription or video conference system. Text to voice is an accessibility feature. It doesn't matter that it's powered by an LLM. If Claude, ChatGPT, whatever do become cheaper the market will crash. My thinking is: Prices go down (they will eventually), if that happens to fast, OpenAI will tank, their valuation is to high to support a $20 a month AI offering, or worse a world where ChatGPT isn't a product, but a feature. If OpenAI goes down the entire industry will have to re-align to a world where we now know that there's a limit to the value an LLM can command. Most of the current AI companies will be bought up at high discounts (as compared to their current valuations) and people are going to be laid off. |
|
|
The personal assistant agent too.
They might overlap for me but not for everyone.
Nothing will crash. The big rich companies like Google, Microsoft already need it as part of their product strategy.
But about ai companies, I don't think their faith matters at all to end consumer and I'm pretty sure companies like character.ai do not run red numbers.