|
|
|
|
|
by jstanley
390 days ago
|
|
I agree with everything you said up to "Nothing in those definitions is capable of expressing the concept of having perceptions (consciousness)". Do you think the universe is not computable? If you think the universe is computable, and you think that you exist in the universe, and you think that you are conscious, don't you think it follows that consciousness can exist within mathematical structures? |
|
Yes, definitionally not, the universe isn't an abstract object let alone one in the shape of a function.
You might, in principle, be able to precisely predict the future of the universe given perfect information using a precise model of the universe. That model, a mathematical function, would be computable. It would be accurate to say that the model describes the universe, but not that the model is the universe.
The thing about mathematical structures is that they are concepts, not things, I feel confident in saying that concepts aren't conscious.