|
|
|
|
|
by chuckadams
383 days ago
|
|
> (consider gimbal lock: "fixing" that requires understanding quaternions or some other orthogonal orientation space, and that's hard!) Or just avoiding gimbal lock by other means. We went to the moon using Euler angles, but I don't suppose there's much of a choice when you're using real mechanical gimbals. |
|
FWIW, my memory is that this was exactly what happened with Apollo 13. It lost its gyro calibration after the accident (it did the thing that was the "just don't do that") and they had to do a bunch of iterative contortions to recover it from things like the sun position (because they couldn't see stars out the iced-over windows).
NASA would have strongly preferred IEEE doubles and quaternions, in hindsight.