|
|
|
|
|
by Aurornis
384 days ago
|
|
> They do, if you read them. I did read the article, which is how I knew Lukas Furtenbach was involved. Please don’t accuse people of not reading the article when they’re specifically talking about content of the article. Anyway, my point was that if these articles wanted to be serious about the science, they’d lead with the studies and science. Instead, they tack on weasel words (literally “some experts say” and “some research” as in your quotes ) in an attempt to make it feel like a both-sides style journalism while leaving Furtenbach’s claims as the headline and the main story. |
|