[behnamoh]

it's got more 'source' than whatever OpenAI provides for their models.

[numpad0]

less alcoholic beverages are fully alcoholic beverages

[subscribed]

0.5% or 0.03% satisfy my "nonalcoholic" criteria.

> Studies have found ethanol levels in commercial apple juice ranging from 0.06 to 0.66 grams per liter, with an average around 0.26 grams per liter[1]

Even apple juice is an alcoholic drink if you push your criteria to absurdity.

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5421578/

[fragmede]

but they're not bleach, and no amount of adding or removing alcohol can transmute the alcohol into something else.

[stavros]

No it doesn't, it has exactly the same source, zero. It has more downloadable binary.

[Aeolun]

That’s the ‘source’ for what the model spits out though, if not the source for what spits out the model.

[prmoustache]

It is just freeware, not open source.

[stavros]

The "source" for something is all the stuff that makes you able to build and change that something. The source for a model is all the stuff that makes you able to train and change the model.

Just because the model produces stuff doesn't mean that's the model's source, just like the binary for a compiler isn't the compiler's source.