|
|
|
|
|
|
by curiousObject
381 days ago
|
|
|
Agree. The only permission the extension needed was “downloads, which normally only allows an extension to download and search for user files, not read or write to them” That’s not an unusual permission for an attractive but safe sounding extension, for example an extension to download all images from a page $100k at least? The value of this to bad guys could be up to millions |
|
|