Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by LiamPowell 393 days ago
This isn't an issue as SQLite doesn't accept contributions because they don't want to risk someone submitting proprietary code and lying about its origin.

I've never understood why other large open-source projects are just willing to accept contributions from anyone. What's the plan when someone copy-pastes code from some proprietary codebase and the rights holders finds it?
3 comments
OJFord 393 days ago
Partly why they have CLAs I suppose?

If someone sells me something they stole, I'm not on the hook for the theft.

link
Vvector 393 days ago
The "plan" is to take out the contaminated code and rewrite it.
link
LiamPowell 393 days ago
If the rights holder is particularly litigious then I could see them suing even if you agreed to take out their code under the argument that you've distributed it and profited from it. I don't know if there's been any cases of this historically but I'd be surprised if there hasn't been.
link
Vvector 391 days ago
Every open source project has the possibility of litigation. Can't always live in fear of the bogeyman
link
timewizard 393 days ago
The same issue is present with the use of LLMs. Are you absolutely sure it didn't just repeat some copyrighted code at you?
link