[jxjnskkzxxhx]

> Today's AI systems are pretty impressive but they are absolutely not, not even slightly, the equivalent of Einstein + Hawking + Tao

Oh is that what the point of the article was? That is so stupid that it didnt even cross my mind.

[gjm11]

I mean, that's what the article explicitly says. (Perhaps it's all a metaphor for something else, or something, and some subtler point went over my head, in which case I owe the author an apology.)