[underbluewaters]

Successful standards usually start out scrappy, are embraced by a community, and then are blessed by standards bodies. What comes out of working groups of standards bodies rarely gains traction. See xhtml vs "html5".

[croes]

Does MCP still have the security issues?

A big mistake in the first place to start it without proper security.

That not Web 2.0 2.0, that‘s Web 1.0

[jedisct1]

MCP Servers are usually installed locally and can do whatever they want on the local machine.

But this is solved by sandboxes such as mcp.run .

[croes]

Sandboxes aren’t a solution just a workaround for a bigger problem

[doug_durham]

It's a mistake to not start at all because of an issue that may not be important for many important use cases.

[croes]

It’s a mistake to start and to think security is a non important issue.

Anything that’s connected to the web has to consider security at step one.

How often are we repeating the same mistakes over and over again?

[troupo]

It's a mistake to invent your own terminology, skip all existing forms/standards/protocols of communication and chose the objectively worst-fitting one, and skip implementing one of the most fundamental part required by nearly anything