[bko]

I don't know. A lot of foreign students from Harvard are Chinese. Seems kind of weird that they were found to discriminate against American Asians and then they import foreign Asian students. Goes against the whole we want diversity thing, no?

[intended]

That sentence is breath taking.

> A lot of foreign students from Harvard are Chinese. Seems kind of weird that they were found to discriminate against American Asians and then they import foreign Asian students.

How do I put this delicately - the Race part is not what is bringing the difference in lived experience.

[bko]

The university defines diversity broadly, encompassing race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic background, nationality, sexual orientation, and other aspects of identity.

Don't gaslight me and pretend they don't focus a lot on race when figuring out their student body. They report on it and it's a huge distinguishing characteristic when looking at median standardized scores across diff characteristics. There's little difference between socio economic groups, gender, nationality etc. But if you look across just Asian and non Asian students, the scores are dramatically higher with Asians meaning that they have higher standards. Courts found this to be true

[intended]

Chinese people, are the same to you, as Americans if Asian descent.

That is what you conflated in your framing.

[bko]

I agree. Then why are Asian students held to a higher standard?

Asian-Americans admitted to Harvard earned an average SAT score of 767 across all sections. Every section of the SAT has a maximum score of 800. By comparison, white admits earned an average score of 745 across all sections, Hispanic-American admits earned an average of 718, Native-American and Native-Hawaiian admits an average of 712, and African-American admits an average of 704

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2018/10/22/asian-american...

[lern_too_spel]

What about non-American Chinese students? Those kids from Shanghai are no slouches at standardized tests.