[leetharris]

Much like others, this is my stack (or o1-pro instead of Gemini 2.5 Pro). This is a big reason why I use aider for large projects. It allows me to effortlessly combine architecture models and code writing models.

I know in Cursor and others I can just switch models between chats, but it doesn't feel intentional the way aider does. You chat in architecture mode, then execute in code mode.

[adriand]

I also use Aider (lately, always with 3.7-sonnet) and really enjoy it, but over the past couple of weeks, the /architect feature has been pretty weird. It previously would give me points (e.g. 1. First do this, 2. Then this) and, well, an architecture. Now it seems to start spitting out code like crazy, and sometimes it even makes commits. Or it thinks it has made commits, but hasn't. Have you experienced anything like this? What am I doing wrong?

[piperswe]

Cline also allows you to have separate model configuration for "Plan" mode and "Act" mode.

[Keyframe]

could you describe a bit how does this work? I haven't had much luck with AI so far, but I'm willing to try.

[BeetleB]

https://aider.chat/2024/09/26/architect.html

The idea is that some models are better at reasoning about code, but others are better at actually creating the code changes (without syntax errors, etc). So Aider lets you pick two models - one does the architecting, and the other does the code change.

[SirYandi]

https://harper.blog/2025/02/16/my-llm-codegen-workflow-atm/

"tl:dr; Brainstorm spec, then plan a plan, then execute using LLM codegen. Discrete loops. Then magic."