|
|
|
|
|
|
by 3abiton
398 days ago
|
|
|
Ot was a fun read, but, how do you know these changes made your paper better? Your assumption is that reviewers approach the reviewing process with the same knowledge and goals, or are quite objective, but that's mot the case in all my publication history. So how can you prove causal effects with 1 sample? |
|
|