|
|
|
|
|
by vidarh
387 days ago
|
|
Conversely, Ruby is often seen as facilitating DSL's, but none of it changes syntax, because the syntax as-is is flexible enough that redefining methods is sufficient. But everything still abides by the same syntactical rules. The more orthogonal or flexible the language is, the less there tends to be a distinction between redefining syntactical elements and defining functions or methods. |
|