|
|
|
|
|
by lurking_swe
388 days ago
|
|
> The civil servant developers working on them do what they can, but they have been warming management, who have warned government, that they systems are insecure, but govt won't spend money on updating them. Makes sense. So if i’m understanding this right, the fault basically lies with the decision maker(s) in government who said “nope, not worth paying $x to secure/maintain our systems” Sounds to me like they shouldn’t be allowed to create these public facing systems in the first place if they can’t afford (or don’t want to) maintain them. no? That would be like paying someone to build a bridge for you and then deciding to purposely ignore maintenance on the bridge when the experts warn you it needs maintenance. |
|
Have you ever worked in a government job? This is a common reality in those kind of roles. Reality doesn't neatly fit into: "I have enough money to build this thing I desperately need" and "I have enough money to maintain this properly" and "I have enough budget to run the country well enough not to get kicked out of the job"