|
|
|
|
|
by Ukv
402 days ago
|
|
> while the silicon closest to its capabilities needs more like tens of kW. I think looking at power consumption for the very edge of what technology is just barely capble of may be misleading, since that's inherently at one extreme of the current cost-capability trade-off curve[0] and stands to drop the most drastically from efficiency improvements. You can now run models equivalent in capability to initial version of ChatGPT on sub-20w chips, for instance. Or, looking over a longer timeframe, we can now do far more on a 1-milliwatt chip[1] than on the 150kW ENIAC[2]. [0]: https://i.imgur.com/GydBGRG.png [1]: https://spectrum.ieee.org/syntiant-chip-plays-doom [2]: https://cse.engin.umich.edu/about/history/eniac-display/ |
|