[b112]

I wouldn't call data "source", whether a book, a sound track, video, etc.

In my view of the world, the code to train, the software to run, that's open source joy.

Now... should the trained, and vectored data be free? Maybe so.

But I bet this UN thing doesn't cover that.

[andy99]

I didn't call the data the source and in the past have explicitly argued that training data is not necessary to exercise the freedoms normally associated with open source.

Llama models have usage restrictions that go against any mainstream definitions of open source.

[b112]

The model is part of the data, agreed?

Anyhow, I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, simply stating my thoughts. And I focused on data because I see OSS code everywhere, so presume there is no issue there.