|
|
|
|
|
by svat
392 days ago
|
|
The usage of "thesaurus" in English for a kind of book dates back to the first one by Peter Mark Roget in 1852, which was indeed synonyms and antonyms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roget%27s_Thesaurus see the Project Gutenberg link mentioned in another comment: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/10681/pg10681-images.ht... (or indeed, just read the posted article here). This is still the primary meaning of "thesaurus" in English, and contrasted with "dictionary": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus It's very unusual for a thesaurus to contain meanings (beyond the category head/name) and etymology, let alone explanation. Such things are usually found in a dictionary instead. So it's more a question for you: where did your unusual idea of "thesaurus" come from? As one of your examples you mention dictionaries, so that's especially confusing. |
|
> The usage of "thesaurus" in English for a kind of book dates back to the first one by Peter Mark Roget in 1852
To nitpick, though of interest: The usage meaning a book of words organized by their senses indeed dates to Roget's use in 1852, as the parent comment says. An earlier usage is more generally a 'treasury' of knowledge (in book form): there was a Thesaurus Linguæ Romanæ et Britannicæ ... in 1565, a Thesaurus Linguæ Latinæ compendiarius ... in 1736, and John Stuart Mill in 1840 wrote about "A thesaurus of commonplaces for the discussion of questions."
Source: Oxford English Dictionary