[necovek]

Nope.

Pair programming still results in a code change needing review from another party (or you get increasingly buggy code because the two people have already prejudiced each other during design, discussion and implementation).

Just like "advanced metrics" in team sports (eg. two person lineups in NBA: they can tell you how effective were all lineups with eg. Jokic and Gordon in Nuggets been), nothing would stop management from looking at which person has led to a pair being most effective.

Still, that's beside the point: the goal of metrics is not to judge individual performance (even if it is a signal somewhat), but to be able to tell if we are improving (which you can only do through measurement). I invite you to come up with better metrics which can tell you if you are doing better or not in 3 months time.

If you believe you are being judged on artificial metrics, it's simple: push smaller commits and create smaller tickets. That will make management happy and will make you faster.