|
|
|
|
|
by Nevermark
401 days ago
|
|
A simple example is I have a series of three ordered connected things. I called the first one “pre” since it “precedes” the others. I called the last one “pro” since it “proceeds” from the others. These are somewhat poetic/whimsical terms, for an abstract arrangement, but it’s nice to have good terms even for non-serious stuff. I couldn’t come up with an equally concise term for the middle. Claude came up with “per” as in “through” for the middle thing. Couldn’t be more fitting. |
|