Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
grodriguez100
391 days ago
It is the same license but the copyright notice is different, so no, not sufficient.
1 comments
gmm1990
391 days ago
Fair enough response to my post but they have the llama license too
https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/llama/llama.cpp/L...
link
camgunz
391 days ago
The GH issue's point [0] is that this isn't in the binary distributions, but it has to be "included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software" (from the MIT license), which applies to binary distributions as well.
[0]:
https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/3185
link
grodriguez100
391 days ago
Right, sorry. Didn’t notice.
link