|
|
|
|
|
by bArray
394 days ago
|
|
Your reply reads as if you have skin in this game and are for some unknown reason offended by the idea of a fair test. > This is being done to prove a point, that rust is just as efficient as c while being memory safe. I understand that, but it could just end up being a measure of how much money we are willing to pour into libraries. If you start putting money in to any language, you should see efficiency increase and bugs decrease. A nice result would be them being about the same speed, but Rust offering greater protections. > Your idea is misaligned with the goals of the contest and more a moral complaint on “fairness”. Where do you get this notion that any entity offering their own funds in a contest needs to distribute it evenly? It was an intrigue, not a demand. |
|