[lazide]

which part? your timelines seem pretty off if you think ‘weeks’ was a remotely possible timeline at the time either.

There was no electronic communication of any sort (electricity was barely understood at the time), and best case transit time was around 6 weeks each way, often 8-12 if possible at all. It was also highly seasonal, and still very dangerous.

So the absolute fastest turn around time was 12 weeks/3 months, and more realistically 4-6 months. With some decent odds that one of the legs of the trip might sink, losing all hands.

It’s why a literal founding father (and one of the most influential ones) was the ambassador. No one else could be trusted.

[https://www.history.com/articles/benjamin-franklin-france]

[MichaelZuo]

Are you confused about what “many weeks” means? it means >>few weeks

[lazide]

How does that work out 6 months in on your ‘many weeks’ work estimate?

[MichaelZuo]

Huh? Do you not believe 20 to 30 weeks is >>few weeks?

[lazide]

I have never seen (or used) ‘few’ in the description of something when there was 20 of something.

Technically, a year could also count if you said >> few seconds, but no one will take you seriously if you do either.

[MichaelZuo]

You seem very confused… “many weeks” was the exact quote. “few” was only brought up after the bizarre reply as part of the explanation in “>>few weeks”.

And yes “many weeks” easily covers the range of 20 to 30 weeks.

[lazide]

Nope. Just pointing out it’s the wrong scale, and providing context of the right scale. Which is months. Many months.