|
|
|
|
|
by zacksiri
400 days ago
|
|
I've been working on solving this with quite a bit of success, I'll be sharing more on this soon. It involves having 2 systems 1st system is the LLM itself and another system which acts like a 'curator' of thoughts you could say. It dynamically swaps in / out portions of the context. This system is also not based on explicit definitions it relies on LLMs 'filling the gaps'. The system helps the llm break down problems into small tasks which then eventually aggregate into the full task. |
|
In the future such a distinction in memory hierarchies will be more clear
- Primary memory in the training data
- Secondary memory in context
- Tertiary memory in RAG