|
|
|
|
|
by quantike
401 days ago
|
|
I appreciate the reply! Yeah that sounds like the correct path forward is swapping out the type for some enum of numeric types you want to cover. I'd be curious if there's some benefit to the runtime-memory utilization to baking in the precision of the vector if it's known at comptime/runtime. In my own usage of vector DBs I've only ever used a single-precision (f32), and often have a single, known dimension. But if Helix is aiming for something more general purpose, then it makes sense to offer the mixing of precision and dimension in the internals. Cheers |
|