[echo_time]

Note for Firefox users - view the page in Chrome to see more of what they are talking about. I was very confused by some of the images, and it was a world of difference when I tried again in Chrome. Things began to make a lot more sense - is there a flag I am missing in Firefox on the Mac?

[viraptor]

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=hdr there's the tracking issue for HDR support.

[frollogaston]

Tbh, I'm glad this isn't supported in Firefox as of right now

[cubefox]

HDR support in Chrome (Android) looks still broken for me. For one, some of the images on the blog have a posterization effect, which is clearly wrong.

Second, the HDR effect seems to be implemented in a very crude way, which causes the whole Android UI (including the Android status bar at the top) to become brighter when HDR content is on screen. That's clearly not right. Though, of course, this might also be some issue of Android rather than Chrome, or perhaps of the Qualcomm graphics driver for my Adreno GPU, etc.

[davidmurdoch]

Yeah, the HDR videos on my Asus Zenfone 9 (on Android 14) look like really terrible.

[dpacmittal]

Which Android phone are you using?

[cubefox]

This one: https://gsmarena.com/motorola_edge_30_ultra-11206.php

[mikepurvis]

Can confirm on Windows 11 with HDR enabled on my display— I see the photos in the article correctly on Chrome and they're a grey mess on Firefox.

[lloeki]

On macOS even without HDR enabled on my display there's a striking difference due to better tone mapping between Safari and Firefox.

If I enable HDR the Firefox ones become a gray mess vs the lights feeling like actual lights in Safari.

[throwaway314155]

For what it's worth, your comment has me convinced I just "can't see" HDR properly because I have the same page side-by-side on Firefox and Chrome on my M4 MBP and honestly? Can't see the difference.

edit: Ah, nevermind. It seems Firefox is doing some sort of post-processing (maybe bad tonemapping?) on-the-fly as the pictures start out similar but degrade to washed out after some time. In particular, the "OVERTHROW BOXING CLUB" photo makes this quite apparent.

That's a damn shame Firefox. C'mon, HDR support feels like table stakes at this point.

edit2: Apparently it's not table stakes.

> Browser support is halfway there. Google beat Apple to the punch with their own version of Adaptive HDR they call Ultra HDR, which Chrome 14 now supports. Safari has added HDR support into its developer preview, then it disabled it, due to bugs within iOS.

at which point I would just say to `lux.camera` authors - why not put a big fat warning at the top for users with a Firefox or Safari (stable) browser? With all the emphasis on supposedly simplifying a difficult standard, the article has fallen for one of its most famous pitfalls.

"It's not you. HDR confuses tons of people."

Yep, and you've made it even worse for a huge chunk of people. :shrug: Great article n' all just saying.

[gwbas1c]

I wasn't using Firefox, but I had the page open on an old monitor. I dragged the page to an HDR display and the images pop.