[david38]

Seriously? A candidate puts in a week of work and he can’t be guaranteed a 30 minute discussion?

Nobody is getting a few hundred or few thousand submissions to evaluate. Nobody. If you are getting 1k applicants, at best 50 are asked to do a take-home and even then, not all at once.

If by some miracle 100 people did this to completion at the same time, there should be a notice to the effect that due to high volume, blah blah blah.

[saagarjha]

I don't really think it was intended to take a week of work.

[user_7832]

…which is totally understandable… if the hiring manager had communicated that. They could’ve easily mailed back “Hi this proposal seems much more detailed than what we need for evaluation, please save yourself some time and energy.”

The author may have had issues (I personally don’t count “need clear instructions” as an issue - edit - I see they didn’t adhere to the TUI prompt), but the hiring manager definitely did.

[jorams]

> …which is totally understandable… if the hiring manager had communicated that.

I agree that the hiring manager could have handled it much better, but as a rule: If at any point during any hiring process you feel like you need to spend even close to a full time week of work on anything without being very explicitly told so, you are wrong.

[dallbee]

I am a hiring manager and we do take home homeworks. I fully agree that this is a key piece of communication. I always take the time to tell candidates that although they have as much time as they want, we expect 2-3 hours of effort at most, to be respectful of their time. Without that, take home problems would seem predatory.

[barrenko]

Interviews check for fit first of all, and especially in a buyers market the point is not to solve the assignment, it's to blow it out of the water.

It's meant for the person for whom it's ideally an afterthought. Tough reality.