|
|
|
|
|
by ninetyninenine
398 days ago
|
|
> That's not a terribly useful criteria, though. A Markov chain can produce novel sentences, hell a bingo machine can if you write words on the balls. "Knowledge" is kind of meaningless but also seemingly profound. I don’t know why you came up with this pedantic example. Perhaps you’re autistic? If so then I apologize for assuming you aren’t. Everyone knows that we are talking about more than just knowledge consisting of a random sting of letters. We are talking about actual useful knowledge. |
|
A certain amount of pedantry is required for these discussions, otherwise we're left in a place where we can't define "actual useful knowledge". At this moment I assume you're defining "actual useful knowledge" as simply anything you find convincing, which is a criteria that could be easily gamed. How are you determining that knowledge is actually novel?