[artski]

Fair take—it's definitely context-dependent. In some cases, solo-maintainer projects can be great, especially if they’re stable or purpose-built. But from a trust and maintenance standpoint, it’s worth flagging as a signal: if 90% of commits are from one person who’s now inactive, it could mean slow responses to bugs or no updates for security issues. Doesn’t mean the project is bad—just something to consider alongside other factors.

Heuristics are never perfect and it's all iterative but it's all about understanding the underlying assumptions and taking the knowledge you get out of it with your own context. Probably could enhance it slightly by a run through an LLM with a prompt but I prefer to keep things purely statistical for now.

[85392_school]

It could also mean that the project is stable. Since you only look at the one repository's commit activity, a stable project with a maintainer who's still active on GitHub in other places would be "less trustworthy" than a project that's a work in progress.

[kstrauser]

I agree. I have a popular-ish project on GitHub that I haven't touched in like a decade. I would if needed, but it's basically "done". It works. It does everything it needs to, and no one's reported a bug in many, many years.

You could etch that thing into granite as far as I can tell. The only thing left to do is rewrite it in Rust.

[artski]

Not a bad idea tbh, maybe an additional how long issues are left open, would be a good idea. Though yeh thats why I was contemplating of not necessarily highlighting the actual number and more have a range e.g. 80-100 is good, 50-70 Moderate and so on.

[InvisGhost]

Be careful with this. Each project has different practices which could lead to false positives and false negatives. You may also create the wrong incentives, depending on how you measure and report things.

[mary-ext]

it seems worthwhile to only mention it as a sidenote rather than a negative score

[delfinom]

The problem is your audience is:

> CTOs, security teams, and VCs automate open-source due diligence in seconds.

The people that probably have less brain cells than the average programmer to understand the nuance in the flagging.

[artski]

Lol yeah tbh - I just made it without really thinking of an audience, just was looking for a project to work on till I saw the paper and figured it would be cool to check it out on some repositories out there. That part is just me asking gpt to make the read me better.

[mlhpdx]

The signal here is how many unpatched vulnerabilities there are maybe multiplied by how long they’ve been out there. Purely statistical. And an actual signal.