[dfxm12]

Please argue in good faith. A new research paper is obviously materially different from "rearranging that text to create a marginally new text".

[shkkmo]

The comment is responding to this line:

> If an AI reads 100 scientific papers and churns out a new one, it is plagiarism.

That is a specific claim that is being directly addressed and pretty clearly qualifies as "good faith".

[int_19h]

"Rearranging text" is not what modern LLMs do though, unless you specifically ask them to.

[dfxm12]

I didn't make this claim. Feel free to bring a cogent argument to a commenter who did.

[gruez]

>I didn't make this claim

???

Did you not literally comment the following?

>A new research paper is obviously materially different from "rearranging that text to create a marginally new text".

What did you mean by that, if that's not your claim?

[dfxm12]

I made that comment, but the bit in quotes is not my claim. I was quoting a grandparent post. If you read from the top, the quotation marks and general flow of the thread should make this clear.