|
|
|
|
|
by theorique
5056 days ago
|
|
I like Nanex's work - the company has done a lot of excellent analysis of the progress of HFT over the past few years. I'm wondering why there tends to be so much value judgment and moralizing in this area coming from various sources (such as Themis). For example: HF traders are taking value from "real" traders ("real" defined by whom?), the systems are "too fast" (compared to what?) or quoting "too much" (compared to what?), and so forth. Exchanges already seem to be penalizing participants with very high quote-to-trade ratios, suggesting that the existing regulatory and commercial system is responding to the needs of its stakeholders. Maybe this kind of reaction is inevitable. I'm sure that there was moralizing in ancient Greece when some entrepreneur bought a load of olive oil at a low price in Athens and ran it on a fast chariot to Thessaloniki, unfairly undercutting the honest merchants of Thessaloniki and pocketing a tidy profit through their "high-speed trading" … same thing with those who used an undersea New York - London cable to gain advance knowledge of events. |
|
EX: Put a 24 hour hold after a stock transaction is held before you can sell and you just killed 99% of HFTing.