[hliyan]

Because LLMs successfully emulate a subset of our brain's functions: memory and imagination (the generative/mixing function). What's missing is our brain's ability to validate the generative output against a model of the environment described by memory and output (the real world), which is built on sensory input. In short, we have a concept of true/false, LLMs don't.

[nurettin]

LLMs emulate language by following intricate links between tokens. This is not meant to emulate memory or imagination, just transforming a list of tokens into another list of tokens, generating language. And language is a huge part of the intelligence puzzle so it looks smart to people despite being quite mechanical.

A next step could be to create a mind, with a piece that works similar to the paretial lobe to give it a sense of self or temporal existence.

[dTal]

> it looks smart to people despite being quite mechanical

Note that brains themselves are also "quite mechanical", as is any physical system or piece of software. "Looks smart", in the limit, reduces to "is smart".

[nurettin]

Brains themselves have a lot more mechanisms to cause emergent behavior what with all the adaptive organic layers so I can't really compare the two 1-1.