| ?? 3d snap shot of Meh (multi 2.71828 huygens[-2][-1]). Unless gravity of situation is to much, then (S)urreal[0].(a)nimated.(T)uring[1] (t)ests / (a)nimated (C)omplex-number (T)uring (t)ests might be the way to go. aka Don't have to worry about bricking things[2] because of limited data and need to apply a t-test[3]. May need metaheuristics to analyze. To much 9.81 might result in visual wrinkles[4] and IRL mov obscuator[5] --------- [-2]: Huygen's theory of light & wavefronts : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpTFU4Yh7gQ [-1]: What is sound? : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhzZAoSYDLE [0] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surreal_number# [1] : physical turing test... : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43938386 [2] : Brickognize .... : https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/4/1898 [3] : https://www.jmp.com/en/statistics-knowledge-portal/t-test [4] : Nanoscale wrinkles ... vibrant color patterns : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43953099 [5] : https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/movfuscator |