|
|
|
|
|
by ZoneZealot
396 days ago
|
|
Parent comment is making a point that it might have been possible for an attacker to avoid discovery via certificate transparency logs, because anyone 'with a wildcard' could pull off the attack, which is not correct. I'm pointing out that a wildcard at the apex of your domain (which is what basically everyone means when saying 'a wildcard'), would not work for this attack. Instead if you were to perform the attack using a wildcard certificate, it would need to be issued for '*.asus.com.example.com.' - which would certainly be obvious in certificate transparency logs. |
|