|
|
|
|
|
by disgruntledphd2
409 days ago
|
|
So you're telling me that Israel have not been stopping aid from getting into Gaza for three weeks now? That is definitely a war crime. And basically Hamas are fighting a guerrilla war and engaging in acts of terror similar to what the Zionists engaged in pre 48. If that was ok, then surely what Hamas are doing is fine? I'm really confused about your notion that the Israeli state is being attacked. It's more accurate to say that both sides are being attacked, and only one side is engaging in plans to displace one side. The last election was in 2007, half the Gaza population wasn't even born then. By your logic the carbrt bombing of Dresden and nuking Japan were fine, is that a fair summation of your position? |
|
Israel is not required to supply its enemy.
If the enemy takes control of humanitarian aid shipments, which Hamas has done consistently from the start, the requirement to supply aid no longer applies.
So Israel has been over-fulfilling its requirements. And when it stops over-fulfilling people start accusing it of war crimes.
You know what's a war crime?
- Using your own civilian population as human shields
- Commandeering humanitarian aid
- Unprovoked attacks targeting civilians
- Using hospitals and schools to launch attacks (including rocket attacks)
Nothing about war is "OK", and neither is your attempt at framing. War is horrible.
Pro-Tip: don't start wars.
Free bonus pro-tip: don't start wars and then cry victim when you start losing.
However, neither Dresden nor the nuclear attacks were "genocide". Look it up.
And last I checked, the consensus is that they were not war crimes, although a vocal minority claims otherwise.