|
|
|
|
|
by ryanwanger
5047 days ago
|
|
I don't understand why people think it's fair to criticize a move like this without offering a plausible alternative that will sustain the business. Sure, letting other people build on it got them to where they are today, but where exactly is that? With massive infrastructure and engineering costs, but little income. Twitter doesn't owe anybody anything. We owe them. If they don't find a way to monetize, then everyone loses. |
|
App.net is a start, but I think it gets it wrong. The value in Twitter is that anyone can use it, anywhere, for the cost of getting online. If we boil it down to just being a highly-scaled service layer with a standard API, maybe the it's the developers themselves that should be paying for API access. Let the 3rd party app ecosystem thrive, but make them pay for what they use. Right now Twitter's doing the opposite and might end up dying slowly over many years as a result.