I was pointing out how nonsensical that commenter's ad hominem attack was. The idea that Julian's sexuality negates the value of any work he's done is straight out of a century you and I have never lived in. Making him out to be some kind of holy warrior who was brought down by his "yearnings" is weird.
Anyway! His comment was dumb, your loaded question is dumb, and this entire thread is dumb.
Anyway! His comment was dumb, your loaded question is dumb, and this entire thread is dumb.