[timewizard]

> A rich country is not one where poor people drive but rather one where rich people take public transport.

You've mixed a subjective measure "rich country" with an objective one "rich people." I can't think of any situation where people of greater means accept more limitations.

Anyways do you have any examples of "rich countries" that have solved this problem?

[ahartmetz]

Good public transport, in a city at least, doesn't feel like a limitation! It's rather convenient, really. There is no problem with making rich people use it, they do it voluntarily.

[Eavolution]

I think it does genuinely feel like a limitation in a lot of cases, and I think it's unhelpful to pretend it doesn't. However it also is very convenient in others.

Everything has it's place, in an ideal area if I was wanting to go a short-medium distance I'd go on a bike, if I wanted a drink or to carry more than practical on my bike or to go a medium length I'd take public transport, and if I wanted to take a lot of stuff, or go in a time sensitive manner, or not want to worry about the last bus, or go somewhere rural I'd take the car.

I don't think good public transport can replace cars in all situations, but it is an extremely good option to have for situations that suit it (which for most people is likely most, but probably not all, of the time).

[ahartmetz]

No, not absolutely all situations. But take my situation - I live in Berlin and I use my car less than once a month. A major reason to drive is to have a car at the destination. I've also had streaks where I drove to the supermarket every couple of weeks, but I haven't done so in months. Main upside is that I can buy whole cases of beer and a bunch of other drinks and heavy stuff, less trouble carrying. Otherwise, the closest supermarkets are about five minutes by foot.

[danans]

> Anyways do you have any examples of "rich countries" that have solved this problem?

Rich countries that have good public transit? Sure, that's easy.

Denmark Singapore Japan Germany Switzerland France UK ...

Here are some middle income countries that have good public transit also:

China Spain Portugal Italy Taiwan

[timewizard]

Okay, so to come back to the goal posts, do "rich people" ride the public transit in those countries?

[const_cast]

Yes, because it's faster. Doesn't really matter if you can afford a 400,000 dollar Rolls Royce if you're stuck in downtown London traffic for 30 minutes. You could've just taken the underground in 5...

[ahartmetz]

They sure do. The ones that can't or don't want to hire a personal driver or go everywhere by taxi anyway. Because driving yourself isn't much fun in a city and you need to be sober every time, too.

[kelnos]

I'm skeptical. For nearly any definition of "rich", someone can afford to take an Uber/Lyft/taxi everywhere, at least.

I think the real reason your average rich person would take transit is because in some places, at some times of day, it's significantly faster than driving. But I do believe there's some -- probably fairly small -- subset of rich people who ride public transit simply because they prefer to.

[_dain_]

Yes rich people take the Tube/trains in London. It's convenient and often faster than driving, especially at rush hour. Basically everyone uses the Tube except for like, royalty or billionaires or whatever. In fact, people pay a premium (in rent) to live close to Tube stations.

Also, planes are a form of public transport and rich people take them all the time.

This part of your earlier comment confuses me:

> I can't think of any situation where people of greater means accept more limitations.

What "limitations" are you talking about here?

[danans]

Probably not billionaires, but millionaires do. I know multi millionaires (6-7 figures) in the US who ride public transportation in places like SF and NYC.

[kelnos]

> I know multi millionaires (6-7 figures)

Er, 6 figures is a hundred-thousand-aire, not a millionaire. Perhaps you meant 7-8?