|
|
|
|
|
by jayd16
405 days ago
|
|
Btw, do any good, modern CI tools support incremental rollout of multiple in-flight changes on monoliths? As in patch A is live, team B wants to rollout A+B and team C wants to rollout A+C. Ideally, A+B+C will eventually go live. Do cloud/paas providers deeply support this flow anymore? Every dashboard would need to compare across multiple live versions and I haven't tried that in a while. |
|
If you're instead doing this with feature branches or something like that, then by definition you don't have CI. You have NI: Never Integration.
Because, to an approximation, there's never any point in time where all of the code you're working on is integrated together so that everyone has a chance to see how what they're doing interacts with what everyone else is doing. And yes, it is possible for a branch to successfully auto-merge and produce something that compiles and passes all automated tests, and still introduce a horrible regression defect because of an unanticipated interaction between two different changes on two different feature branches. I don't see it happen often, but when it does it usually creates such a big production SNAFU that even once every 5 years is still way too often for my taste.