[roenxi]

These are actually well charted waters - people are shooting at each other and some fairly high percentage of the time everything calms down but the rest of the time it escalates crazily with both sides losing control. Situation as old as time, long rich history of provocative military action.

I observe from time to time that Moscow appears to be under fire from the occasional US-sponsored attack for example. So far, so good. Most of the time things don't go terribly wrong, just the worst case scenarios here are quite grim. The India-Pakistan situation is probably a bit safer because anything catastrophic is likely to just kill millions/billions of people in India and Pakistan instead of an entire hemisphere of carnage.

[happyopossum]

> from time to time that Moscow appears to be under fire from the occasional US-sponsored attack for example

Ok, you lost me there..

[brabel]

The US is definitely sponsoring Ukraine in the war together with the EU so when Ukraine attacks Moscow, which it is currently doing regularly, it seems like that’s a fair characterization. If Russia were strong enough they would surely be responding to those attacks not only by hitting Ukraine but their “sponsors” too.

[roenxi]

Things like https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-drone-attack-moscow-1.....

[pjc50]

Didn't the US sponsorship abruptly terminate?

[xkcd1963]

How is his viewpoint not valid?