|
|
|
|
|
by PaulDavisThe1st
414 days ago
|
|
The C++ code implements the intended goal, not the problem TFA is trying to illustrate. Changing between: for (auto i : vec)
and for (auto & i : vec)
has essentially no bearing on what the author is trying to show. If they were focused on how move semantics are always important, they would not use an integer type. |
|