|
|
|
|
|
by erikerikson
406 days ago
|
|
I get your math and appreciate the insight within it. At the same time, PTAs accept cash which when not being spent on private school is available. The challenge is getting those parents to allocate it when it will be spread across the entire student body. Far more impactful is the factor of alignment of incentives that given wealthy families' generally greater proximity to power can deliver funding. I liked this: it's not private school vs public school, it is private school vs public school plus a tuition's worth of enrichment. Your other comment does get at why my kid is in private school: you can't ignore special education needs. |
|
I think this is magical thinking underlying the concept: That wealthy parents will step up to provide money to privately fund the public schools for everyone.
We have plenty of evidence that the is just isn’t the case, though. People spend that money on things like sending their kids to school with their own lunches and hiring private tutors.
When parents have lost faith in a school’s ability to provide good education (or lunches, or activities, etc) they don’t think the best course of action is to send the school a lot of money and hope for the best. They take matters into their own hands, outside of school.
The entire concept is built on layers of wishful thinking that just aren’t supported.