|
|
|
|
|
by lelanthran
413 days ago
|
|
> But for displaying the table in the first place? Static HTML is invariably faster in my experience. Okay, lets assume it is faster by whatever the latency is for a network request. What sort of use-case are we talking about where a table is displayed on a content or e-commerce side and the user is not allowed to re-sort it? It's all about the user's experience, not the developer's, and I can't see how a UX that prevents sorting is a better UX. Ditto for a sortable table that refreshes the page each time the user sorts it. |
|