|
|
|
|
|
|
by rc00
406 days ago
|
|
|
> and then submitted here by someone > I just don’t care about karma that much. The first 500 is the only that matters. I find it hard to say that submitting a story that people found valuable is “abuse.” The submitting account is automated and mostly non-deterministic. Forget the fake internet points and focus on the fact that there are accounts on this site that mostly exist to spam. Isn't the value of this site that humans curate what is posted? Or is automating submissions not a form of abuse? Good to know where your ethics are. |
|
|
The value of this site is that interesting things get posted. Them being from a human is not inherently required. I do think that it's more likely to be the case when it comes from a human, but that's secondary.
Also, I would argue that upvoting is more important to curation than submission.
> Or is automating submissions not a form of abuse?
I do not believe it is inherently a form of abuse. The site guidelines do not prohibit automatic submissions, for example. If they did, then yeah, I'd say it's not a good thing to do.