| You seem confused. At one point you claim that this is about helping the women who are Swedish citizens and trying to question Assange so they can charge him with rape or figure out what happened. Have we agreed that in the previous comment you seems to be concerned and think the Swedish government is also concerned about these women? > These women have a right to make these accusations, and they have a right for the state to investigate them. Nobody could possibly deny this. and > not beyond the realms of possibility, is that these women are genuinely making these accusations. Those statements seem to support that, wouldn't you say? However, when presented with the question of why didn't they just come in and questioned him after being invited and granted access you reply with > Sweden is well within their rights to refuse that offer. So they are just dragging their feet refusing the offer. Is it because they don't like British food or is the travel too grueling. Remember, they are spending all this effort and time supposedly because they deeply care about the fate of these two women. The next step in the process is the questioning and then after being invited to question him to move the process along they refuse. You'll have to forgive everyone if they don't quite believe the official reasons. To me it sounds fishy for example. > Assange in the embassy and decided they wanted to charge him he would just walk out happily? It doesn't matter what happens then. They identified a next step in the process and they claim they cannot accomplish it. While it has been clear that they can. |