|
|
|
|
|
|
by smartician
5052 days ago
|
|
|
I fully agree with you there. It just makes the decision to sell their new game as free with IAP even more questionable. They should have just sold the new game for $4.99 up front. Even if only a fraction of the people who installed the free game would have bought it, they'd still have most likely made tens of thousands of dollars in a week. If it hadn't sold at all, THEN I would have started thinking about a freemium model. |
|
|
Yes. I think the tough part when you have a higher priced game is getting the word out there and getting written up in some major blogs.
Personally I consider $1 or $2 games to be disposable. It's not much of a loss if they suck. Once you go into higher price points, I base my purchase decision on name recognition/reputation or word-of-mouth.