|
|
|
|
|
|
by mike_hearn
405 days ago
|
|
|
I already showed that the UK - definitely a country in Northern Europe - doesn't have a majority that finds its state broadcaster trustworthy. We can assume those people who don't find it trustworthy don't support it, or if they do, do so only out of inertia and wouldn't care if it went away either. > The business model of for-profit digital news production is not economically viable outside of certain niches or clickbait/ragebait State media is much more than just news, so are you agreeing at least that all of the non-news production should be defunded? But, of course it's viable to do for-profit news. There are plenty of successful private news companies out there that aren't niche. You are welcome to define all news you dislike as ragebait but that's clearly not an argument, it's just a "lame value judgement". > Free, broadly available, non-commercial journalism is a critical part of our society It's not free and it's not non-commercial. People are paid to produce it via ordinary commercial contracts, and then people are forced to buy it. Nor is it a critical part of society. Society did just fine before state media was a thing. Meanwhile the injustice upon innocent people remains, and the existence of it harms society itself greatly via other paths as well. |
|
|
> Meanwhile the injustice upon innocent people remains, and the existence of it harms society itself greatly via other paths as well.
Your hyperbole is exasperating. I'll pass.