|
|
|
|
|
|
by deeThrow94
408 days ago
|
|
|
> We don't call this recursive... it's just incrementing x That's not a recursive function as it's written, but you could certainly consider it a form of symbolic recursion. This just isn't a very useful characterization in an iterative/imperative context. You could frame incrementing as recursive, though—this is just peano axioms/church encoding. |
|
|