|
|
|
|
|
|
by palata
411 days ago
|
|
|
That's wrong: they pay Grafana Labs to use it as proprietary, as noted in another comment: https://lwn.net/Articles/1019686/#CommAnchor1019710 > Grafana's a great example of this. AWS and Azure _could_ have sold the unmodified AGPL Grafana as a service or published their modified versions, but instead, they both struck proprietary licensing and co-marketing agreements with Grafana Labs. |
|
|